Writes JDs, sources, screens, books interviews - from $200/mo. Your ATS just watches.
One agent writes the JD, sources from 12+ channels, screens every applicant, and books the interviews - from $200/mo flat. Your ATS just watches.
First 10 candidates free. No credit card.
Trusted by teams at
All-in-one, literally
The average 30-200 person team runs six tools to hire one engineer. VScout replaces all of them with one chat.
Today’s stack
Six tools. One headache.
$6K-$45K/yr combined
Tomorrow’s stack
One chat. Same job done.
JD, sourcing, screening, scheduling, scorecards, analytics - all behind a single chat thread.
from $200/mo flat
No integrations to wire up. No data to migrate after Day 1 - we import from your current ATS in one click.
The shift
Your ATS pings you when a candidate applies. VScout reads the résumé, scores it against your rubric, and drafts the next-step email - before you've opened the tab.
Six subscriptions just to see the funnel. VScout moves candidates through it: sourced, screened, scheduled, scored, offered. You approve, the agent ships.
You don't operate VScout. You direct it in chat. “Find me five senior backend engineers in Berlin.” Done - with citations to every résumé line it scored on.
What the agent does
01 · Source
Describe the role in plain English. The agent generates an optimized JD and pulls candidates from 12+ channels - résumé sites, code platforms, your past pipeline, referrals.
02 · Screen
Same rubric, every candidate. Each score links back to the line in the résumé or repo. No vibes, no missed applicants, no “the recruiter liked this one.”
03 · Schedule
Top candidates get an outreach email, a calendar link, and a confirmed slot - without anyone touching a scheduling tool. You approve the shortlist; the agent does the choreography.
Versus the legacy ATS
Greenhouse, Lever, Workable, Ashby - all great filing cabinets. None of them do the work.
The Data Engine
A $200/mo agent works because the data underneath it is broader, more structured, and more transparent than what your recruiter pieces together by hand.
LinkedIn, GitHub, open-web profiles, ATS imports, referrals, past pipeline, talent pools. The agent pulls and de-dupes across all of them so candidates aren't missed because one source went stale.
Résumé, work samples, GitHub commits, screening responses, prior interviews - all run through the same rubric. No "the recruiter liked this one's vibe." Every applicant gets a fair, comparable read.
Every screening decision links back to the line in the résumé, the repo, the answer. RLS-isolated per org, exportable anytime. You see the why, not just the score.
Pricing
Replace your entire recruiting stack - ATS, sourcing, scheduling, screening, communications, and analytics.
Traditional ATS: $6K-$45K/yr
$200/mo
Everything from JD to offer letter - sourcing, screening, scheduling, scorecards. Live in 5 minutes.
No demo call. No procurement. No sales team to dodge.
Make your first hire - freeFAQ
The agent does the work, not the dashboard. Free for your first 10 candidates.
Make your first hire in 5 minutes