All your hiring. One agent does it.
Writes JDs, sources, screens, books interviews - from $200/mo. Your ATS just watches.
One agent writes the JD, sources from 12+ channels, screens every applicant, and books the interviews - from $200/mo flat. Your ATS just watches.
First 10 candidates free. No credit card.
Trusted by teams at
All-in-one, literally
Cancel the stack. Keep the hires.
The average 30-200 person team runs six tools to hire one engineer. VScout replaces all of them with one chat.
Today’s stack
Six tools. One headache.
$6K-$45K/yr combined
Tomorrow’s stack
One chat. Same job done.
JD, sourcing, screening, scheduling, scorecards, analytics - all behind a single chat thread.
from $200/mo flat
No integrations to wire up. No data to migrate after Day 1 - we import from your current ATS in one click.
The shift
An ATS shows you the work. An agent does it.
Dashboards wait. Agents act.
Your ATS pings you when a candidate applies. VScout reads the résumé, scores it against your rubric, and drafts the next-step email - before you've opened the tab.
Tools track. Agents decide.
Six subscriptions just to see the funnel. VScout moves candidates through it: sourced, screened, scheduled, scored, offered. You approve, the agent ships.
Software is bought. Agents are hired.
You don't operate VScout. You direct it in chat. “Find me five senior backend engineers in Berlin.” Done - with citations to every résumé line it scored on.
What the agent does
From JD to signed offer - one agent runs the loop.
01 · Source
Writes the JD, then finds the people.
Describe the role in plain English. The agent generates an optimized JD and pulls candidates from 12+ channels - résumé sites, code platforms, your past pipeline, referrals.
02 · Screen
Reads every résumé. Scores them the same way.
Same rubric, every candidate. Each score links back to the line in the résumé or repo. No vibes, no missed applicants, no “the recruiter liked this one.”
03 · Schedule
Books the interviews - no Calendly, no chasing.
Top candidates get an outreach email, a calendar link, and a confirmed slot - without anyone touching a scheduling tool. You approve the shortlist; the agent does the choreography.
Versus the legacy ATS
Built in 2025, not 2012.
Greenhouse, Lever, Workable, Ashby - all great filing cabinets. None of them do the work.
The Data Engine
Backed by the data that actually predicts a hire.
A $200/mo agent works because the data underneath it is broader, more structured, and more transparent than what your recruiter pieces together by hand.
12+ sourcing channels, triangulated
Our talent network, ATS imports, referrals, past pipeline, talent pools. The agent pulls and de-dupes across all of them so candidates aren't missed because one source went stale.
Every signal scored, consistently
Résumé, work samples, GitHub commits, screening responses, prior interviews - all run through the same rubric. No "the recruiter liked this one's vibe." Every applicant gets a fair, comparable read.
Your data, with citations
Every screening decision links back to the line in the résumé, the repo, the answer. RLS-isolated per org, exportable anytime. You see the why, not just the score.
Pricing
The price is the pitch.
Replace your entire recruiting stack - ATS, sourcing, scheduling, screening, communications, and analytics.
Traditional ATS: $6K-$45K/yr
$200/mo
Everything from JD to offer letter - sourcing, screening, scheduling, scorecards. Live in 5 minutes.
No demo call. No procurement. No sales team to dodge.
Make your first hire - freeFAQ
Questions, answered.
How autonomous is the agent - can it act without me?
Do you replace our existing ATS?
What if our team isn't AI-savvy?
How is this $200/mo when Greenhouse is $15K+?
What's in the free tier?
Do candidates know they're talking to AI?
Can I export my data if I leave?
Post the next role at 9. Have a shortlist by 5.
The agent does the work, not the dashboard. Free for your first 10 candidates.
Make your first hire in 5 minutes